Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
For Tom Connelly
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown | Report | 25 Apr 2006 19:15 |
|
For some reason, GR won't let me reply to your 1841 thread! Joseph would be about 16 in 1841 and quite likely have left home, so you wouldn't find him with his father. It's also possible he was illegitimate and invented a dad with the same name for respectability. You would need to check the Manchester parish baptism registers to find his likely birth year and his mother's first name at least. Are there any clues in the witnesses to his wedding? nell |
|||
|
Right said Fred | Report | 25 Apr 2006 19:23 |
|
Nell, The witnesses are Mary McLeaf (?) and P Heptinstall. The problem is finding the time to get over to Manchester, but I will have to try and get over there at some point. As for the witnessess - I have no idea who they are, but I am pretty sure that they aren't rellies of Ellen. |
|||