Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Boards

Quick Search

Single word search

Tools

Findmypast DNA Banner

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

please look at 1881 Census.

Login to Add Reply Watch This
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Blue Moon

Blue Moon Report 13 Feb 2008 16:26

1881 Census

Name: Maud Fox
Birth: abt 1875 - Newcastle, Staffordshire, England
Residence: 1881 - Newcastle Under Lyme, Staffordshire, England

Daughter ?

What do you think?
Image also states daughter.

Dorsetbaby

Dorsetbaby Report 13 Feb 2008 16:32

census 1881
FOX, William Head Married M 70 Chairmaker Master Employing 1 Boy (Cabinet)
Newcastle
Staffordshire
FOX, Mary Wife Married F 71
Burslem
Staffordshire
FOX, Maud Daughter Single F 6 Scholar
Newcastle
Staffordshire
PANKHURST, Adam Son In L Married M 60 ((Retired Chemist & Druggist))
Wybunbury
Cheshire
PANKHURST, Mary J Daughter In L Married F 32
Newcastle
Staffordshire
PANKHURST, Ruth Grand Daughter Single F 4
Newcastle
Staffordshire

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RG number:
RG11 Piece:
2698 Folio:
12 Page:
16

Registration District:
Newcastle Under Lyme Sub District:
Newcastle Under Lyme EnumerationDistrict:
Ecclesiastical Parish:


Civil Parish:
Newcastle Under Lyme Municipal Borough:
Address:
3 Market Lane, Newcastle Under Lyme County:
Staffordshire


I see why you are asking now. I think that would be grandaughter?
Did you notice that the son in law is only 10 years younger than the father.

Ann

Ann Report 13 Feb 2008 16:35

As Mary is listed as being 71yrs old and William as being 70yrs old, it seems more likely that Maud is their grandaughter. She is only 6years old!!. Mary would have been past child bearing age at the age of 65yrs which would have been when Maud was born!!

Blue Moon

Blue Moon Report 13 Feb 2008 16:38

Thanks Dorsetbaby + Ann

yes, i did notice the son-in-law ,
as you say she must be a grandaughter.