Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Janine
|
Report
|
10 Feb 2008 13:04 |
Hi. I am trying to figure out in which church my great great grandparents would have been married. As far as I know they were Catholic. Their names were Edward Rothwell FODEN and Mary WORTHINGTON. He was born in about 1834 in Manchester. In the 1851 census I have found, what I believe to be, his family living in Manchester in the Ecclesiastical district of St Andrews. Am I correct in assuming that this would be the local Church of England parish? He is living in Ardwick in the Ecclesiastical district of St Silas in 1861 with his first wife Isabella. In 1871 he is still married to Isabella and they were living in Droylsden, in the Ecclesiastical district of St Mary's. In 1881 he, and his second wife Mary, were living in Stretford, in the Ecclesiastical district of St Matthew. Mary WORTHINGTON was born in Manchester. I think I have found her in 1861 living in Ardwick in the Ecclesiastical district of St Francis. Can anyone advise on the most likely Catholic Church for their marriage in 1876 or 1877. In addition how would I access these records in order to find their marriage? I have searched, and others have tried to help, but we have not been able to find their civil marriage record. Regards Janine
|
|
Joan
|
Report
|
10 Feb 2008 16:08 |
Any possibility that Mary may have been married before?
Marriages Dec 1863 (>99%) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Foden Edward Macclesfield 8a 199 Saul Mary Macclesfield 8a 199
|
|
Jeanette
|
Report
|
10 Feb 2008 16:11 |
Hi Janine
On Lancashire bmd there is an Edward Foden's marriage to Isabella Duffy in 1854 (presumably his first wife) at Manchester Cathedral. This would indicate that they were Church of England as Manchester Cathedral is an anglican cathedral. Cannot see another marriage for him 1876/1877 on either Lancs or Free bmd.
|
|
Gerard
|
Report
|
10 Feb 2008 16:18 |
Quote
Knowing your relatives were Catholic, it's natural to assume they were married in church.
When I got a certificate of one of my relatives it showed that they married in a registry office. Totally unexpected, as Catholics didn't recognise that you were really married if they were not conducted in a Catholic church. Quote.
This is simply not true...many Catholics would probably agree with your thoughts but it was not until as late as Easter 1908 that a Catholic marriage HAD to held in a Catholic church for it to be recognised by the Catholic church. Even today there are certain (extreme) circumstances when a marriage not blessed by a priest is recognised by the Catholic church.
Please read the piece about this at the url below
http://www.uksearch2003.co.uk/page2.htm
Depending on the date of a marriage, even though it may appear that a couple were married at a Register Office, this may nor actually be the case. It may have taken place in a Catholic Church and the Registrar attended as was permissible by law. Take a look at lancsbmd, any register office marriages are listed as Register Office OR Registrar Attended.
Gerard Lodge
|
|
Janine
|
Report
|
10 Feb 2008 19:19 |
Thank you all for your replies. Jacqueline, you are correct in guessing that it is because I cannot find a suitable marriage for them in the civil marriage lists, that I have turned to church records. Jeanette I would be most relieved if they turned out to be Church of England, simply because I am more accustomed to searching for CoE ancestors and information of CoE seems to be more widely available. My great grandmother was quite fervently Catholic and I had always assumed that this implied that her ancestors were also Catholic. I wonder whether her mother (Mary WORTHINGTON) was the Catholic, rather than both of her parents, as I had assumed. In those days, if a Catholic married someone from the Church of England would the Catholic Church have been prepared to marry them? Perhaps Isabella was CoE but Edward was Catholic and they married in her church, rather than his. I will start looking at CoE churches now. Joan I believe that it is unlikely that they were married before 1871 since Isabella and Edward were together, with their children, in the 1871 census. Regards Janine
|
|
ErikaH
|
Report
|
10 Feb 2008 20:01 |
Presumably this is Isabella's death.........
Name: Isabella Foden Estimated Birth Year: abt 1833 Year of Registration: 1876 Quarter of Registration: Apr-May-Jun Age at Death: 43 District: Prestwich County: Lancashire Volume: 8d Page: 254 Reg
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
10 Feb 2008 20:06 |
I thought that ALL marriages had to be registered with the local Registrar and thence with GRO .................... unless they were Nonconformist, ie Quaker.
It is of coruse also quite possible that they did not marry.
That was much more common than than we like to think!
sylvia
|
|
ErikaH
|
Report
|
10 Feb 2008 20:12 |
Just to confirm the details..............
1871 census
Name: Edwd R Foden Age: 37 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1834 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Isabella R Gender: Male Where born: Manchr, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Droylsden Ecclesiastical parish: St Mary Town: Droylsden County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Registration district: Ashton Under Lyne Sub-registration district: Audenshaw ED, institution, or vessel: 14 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 70 Household Members: Name Age Edwd R Foden 37 Geo H Foden 11 Isabella Foden 9 Isabella R Foden 38 Sarah A Foden 9 Thos E Foden 3
And 1881 census.......
Name: Edward R. Foden Age: 47 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1834 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Mary Gender: Male Where born: Manchester, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Stretford County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Street address: 2 Chester Rd Condition as to marriage: Married
Occupation: Tobacconist Registration district: Barton Upon Irwell Sub-registration district: Stretford ED, institution, or vessel: 17 Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Clara Foden 3 Edward R. Foden 47 Margaret Foden 2 Mary Foden 34 Thos.Edward Foden 13 Reg
|
|
ErikaH
|
Report
|
10 Feb 2008 20:14 |
Clara's birth.........
Name: Clara Foden Year of Registration: 1877 Quarter of Registration: Apr-May-Jun District: Manchester (1837-1924) County: Lancashire Volume: 8d Page: 265
IF they married prior to Clara's conception, it would have had to be in a very narrow time-scale........
Reg
|
|
Judith23
|
Report
|
10 Feb 2008 20:23 |
At that time it would not normally have been permissable for an anglican to marry a catholic without a dispensation. In effect this may havemeant your relatives were married in a civil ceremony or went to local parish c/e church.
|
|
ErikaH
|
Report
|
10 Feb 2008 20:25 |
Nothing on Lancsbmd for 1876 -1883 inclusive
Reg
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
10 Feb 2008 20:25 |
Janine
your great grandmother could well have converted to Catholicism
her parents could be Anglican
sylvia
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
10 Feb 2008 20:25 |
I wonder if they did in fact marry???
sylvia
|
|
Dianne
|
Report
|
10 Feb 2008 21:04 |
Hi all
I don't want to confuse the issue, but could this marriage be a possibility. Mary would have had to have been married before to a Mr Knight though.
Edward Rothwell married either Mary Knight or Sarah Ann Henshaw
Barton on Irwell
June quarter 1876
8c 766
Dianne xx
Lancashire BMD says this marriage took place at Swinton St Peter, Salford, and yes he did marry Mary Knight.
|
|
Jeanette
|
Report
|
11 Feb 2008 15:30 |
It would have been a bit quick to have remarried June quarter 1876 as Isabella died June quarter 1876. Not impossible but, like Sylvia, I feel it is likely that they did not in fact get married. This was far more common than we like to think. If they had married in church, Catholic or Anglican, it would have been registered.
|
|
Jeanette
|
Report
|
11 Feb 2008 15:39 |
Another thought, Janine. Have you got a copy of your great grandmother's birth certificate. This should tell you if in fact it was a second marriage for Mary. I have one in my family from about the same time which showed it was a second marriage, ie two surnames for the mother.
|
|
Jeanette
|
Report
|
11 Feb 2008 15:44 |
Me again!! Dianne his surname is Foden. Rothwell is his middle name.
|
|
Janine
|
Report
|
11 Feb 2008 20:48 |
Dear All According to my great grandmother's birth certificate her mother was Mary Foden formerly Worthington - no mention of an intervening surname. Perhaps I should apply for her death certificate - would this tell me whether they were married?? Regards and thank you for all your time and suggestions Janine
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
11 Feb 2008 21:09 |
janine
the death certificate could say Widow or Wife of xxxxx
BUT the information on a death certificate depends on what the informant knows or has been told by the deceased
....... and any or all of may be wrong, except for the date of death, the cause of death, and the informant's name and relationship to the deceased!
sylvia
|