Genealogy Chat

I have an 1861 census image and i am having trouble making out a few names . The census image R.G 9/453 Mitcham Parish . It has my Roe Family on there .I am sure there is a daughter and a son surname Henks or could be Hanks and i am sure it also says by first husband where relationship to head should be . I really need a second opioion my eye sight is not all that good but i am sure thats what it says . If it does then i feel so very lucky. Thank you Diana

If you d like to email it I can see if I can help Have messaged you Sue

View Record Rosetta Frenks abt 1844 Deptford, Kent, England Daughter Mitcham Surrey View Record William Frenks abt 1851 Rotherhithe, Sussex, England Son-in-law Mitcham Surrey View Record Ellen Roe abt 1858 Southwark, Surrey, England Daughter Mitcham Surrey View Record Emily Roe abt 1856 Walworth, Surrey, England Daughter Mitcham Surrey View Record Frank Roe abt 1848 Hasalming, Surrey, England Son Mitcham Surrey View Record Harriet Roe abt 1819 Chearnfold, Surrey, England Wife Mitcham Surrey View Record Hener Roe abt 1858 Southwark, Surrey, England Daughter Mitcham Surrey View Record John Roe abt 1860 Tonbridge Wells, Kent, England Son Mitcham Surrey View Record William Roe abt 1816 Bramshot, Hampshire, England Head Mitcham This them ? That Henks/hanks will be hannah i guess - will look at the image Source information: RG9/453 Registration district: Croydon Sub-registration district: Mitcham ED, institution, or vessel: 10 Folio: 56 Page: 10 (click to see others on page) Household schedule number: 43 GSU Number: 542641

Daughter (in law is crossed out) looks like it says 'by first Husb' what does 1851 suggest?

Thank you every body for taking a look for me . I feel very happy with this image what considerate rellies i have letting me know there was a first husband and on a census too this is so exiting (OK i am going over the top but this is worth its weight in gold if you get my drift )there is a ancestry god after all lol . Thanks once again Diana

yes i have them on 1871 1881 1901 1891 census but this is a first time find for rosetta and frank , it is defintatly my family though . My nans nan selina was one of the twins and where frank and rosetta came from i do not know my nan always said her nans parents had other children which i persumed were the ones i knew about .I have no idea if its hank or frank I cannot search the 1851 as i no longer belong to ancestry so i dont know about that census . Diana

1851: George Heath abt 1822 Alfold, Sussex, England Lodger Haslemere Surrey John Houndsom abt 1826 Haslemere, Surrey, England Lodger Haslemere Surrey Alfred Roe abt 1847 Thursley, Surrey, England Son Haslemere Surrey Anna Roe abt 1846 Thursley, Surrey, England Daughter Haslemere Surrey Edward Roe abt 1844 Farnhurst, Sussex, England Son Haslemere Surrey Frank Roe abt 1849 Thursley, Surrey, England Son Haslemere Surrey George Roe abt 1842 Farnhurst, Sussex, England Son Haslemere Surrey John Roe abt 1850 Haslemere, Surrey, England Son Haslemere Surrey Sarah Roe abt 1820 Westdean, Sussex, England Wife Haslemere Surrey William Roe abt 1816 Bram??, Southampton Head Haslemere Surrey William Roe abt 1840 Farnhurst, Sussex, England Son Haslemere Surrey And: Fanny Franks abt 1848 Rotherithe, Surrey, England Daughter Bermondsey Surrey Harriot Franks abt 1820 Chirton, Sussex, England Head Bermondsey Surrey Jane Franks abt 1840 Chirton, Sussex, England Daughter Bermondsey Surrey Rosey Franks abt 1845 Deptford, Kent, England Daughter Bermondsey Surrey William Franks abt 1851 Bermondsey, Surrey, England Son Bermondsey Surrey I found the Franks/Frenks family in 1851 by looking for William who appears in 1861 aged 10. Guess how old he was in 1851???????? One day!! LOl Merry

Marriage entry: Name: Roe, William Record Type: Marriages Quarter: June Year: 1853 District: St Olave Southwark County: London Surrey Volume: 1d Page: 45 Spouse Franks, Harriet Merry

Hi Merry How lucky is that, one day old!!!! I though I was doing well finding my grandad at 4 days old on the 1901!! - obviously not as well as you!! Trudy

I would like to thank every body for giving me all their help and giving their time to help me on this . Thank you all so much A lot of things are already falling into place already with this lot of information. I forcast a few late nights no sleep and and lots of coffee LOL. I have enough here to keep me going for a long time . But i still think that William Roe is a real Gent For putting By First Husband Next to the Children that were not his . At least that way he made sure i Knew that Harriet Had another Husband what was inconsiderate of William Roe was not to tell me who her husband was.. And as for The baby being one day old on the 1851 that was so lucky I feel very lucky today thank you all so much . Diana

Nudged so that i can thank those that helped that might of missed my thank you yesterday . Thank you diana