Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Ancestry 1861
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Deb Vancouver (18665) | Report | 22 May 2005 23:28 |
|
Is the indexing complete for Lancashire on the Ancestry site? I hope not - I can't find my elusive James Aird or his family :( Deb |
|||
|
Lucky | Report | 22 May 2005 23:29 |
|
Deb, Sometimes underneath where you search it has counties to browse?? If you pick the one you want areas should come up that haven't been done/completed. I've found a couple by going through that way Diane |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 22 May 2005 23:30 |
|
It's meant to be complete. Maybe he is mistranscribed. Kath. x |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 22 May 2005 23:32 |
|
I think 1861 is advetised as complete, but out of curiosity i did a free search on 1837online's 1861 census and he didn't show there either. |
|||
|
Deb Vancouver (18665) | Report | 22 May 2005 23:37 |
|
Thanks guys, I have looked under every Surname alternative spelling I can think of. I have also looked under all the James' born 1852 < > 5 years. This man is a mystery. I can't even find a birth for him! One good thing - he is on the 1871 so he DID exist! I'll try the Lancashire search and see what I get. Thanks again, Deb |
|||
|
Alyson. | Report | 22 May 2005 23:55 |
|
Deb. I have got the same problem with 1861. Cannot find my Edward Legassick. Alyson |
|||