Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
can someone please help?
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joan | Report | 6 May 2005 21:50 |
|
Thanks for in put everyone, just been on family org site and noticed sorter Gpo, but didnt pick it up as occupation as all other males seem to have been in building trade, one way or another some still are in the same line now. Slapped wrist again i suppose for not looking closely enough and expecting what i thought rather than seeing what was there. Time for a rest i think, too many slip ups tonight and not a drink passed my lips, Yet!! Joan |
|||
|
Geoff | Report | 6 May 2005 21:23 |
|
It seems to be totally the wrong 'chapter of the book' as image 12 of 54 is Folio 65. Sorter GPO sound quite reasonable as an occupation to me. |
|||
|
Joan | Report | 6 May 2005 21:08 |
|
sorry, irealised as soon as i looked that i'd put the wrong year down, spent so much time looking at 1861 latley that i think i put it in automatically, Hang my head in shame for not checking before posting. Thanks all, Joan |
|||
|
Joan | Report | 6 May 2005 21:02 |
|
Sorry about forgetting to put the year, it was 1881. Glad its not just me that cant find it. Thought hubby was right and i was going blind after spending so long looking at the censuses. Thanks , Joan |
|||
|
The Bag | Report | 6 May 2005 21:00 |
|
have just looked up that ref, and he doesn't seem to be on the page- is that what you mean? jess |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 6 May 2005 21:00 |
|
Joan, I think you need to contact Ancestry, as although he is transcribed as page 8, when you try to view the image, it's page 4 that comes up. However, even going to page 8, he isn't there. They must have mixed up the images. Kath. x |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 6 May 2005 20:59 |
|
RG11 is 1881. Are you getting an error message when you try and view the image? If so, the image is missing |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 6 May 2005 20:55 |
|
Joan, Which census year is this for? And do you have any dates for your ancestor? Mandy :) |
|||
|
Joan | Report | 6 May 2005 20:50 |
|
I have looked (and looked some more) on Ancestry for the original image of Charles W Ozier. Source information: RG11/0275 Sub-registration district: Islington East ED, institution, or vessel: 81 Folio: 7 Page: 8 the transcription is there but cannot find the original to verify the details of employment etc. Have been through the whole set and found some from Shewsbury but not the one that i want. What do i do now, look in Shewsbury? ;0) Thanks, Joan |
|||