General Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Why leave two three year olds alone in a car?

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Purple **^*Sparkly*^** Diamond

Purple **^*Sparkly*^** Diamond Report 13 Nov 2009 15:50

Payout to boy attacked by child
:
A boy who was attacked by another child is to receive compensation A landmark ruling which allowed a five-year-old boy to win compensation after he was attacked by another child with a car jack "opens the floodgates" for playground injury claims, his family's lawyer said.
Jay Jones was just three when he was battered around the head and face by a three-year-old playmate as the children were left alone in a car.
The attacker could not be prosecuted because he was too young, which meant Jay could not claim compensation for his injuries.
According to the criminal justice system, a child must be over 10 to have criminal responsibility, but this case establishes a claimant merely has to prove a criminal act. David Kirwan, from Kirwans Solicitors, who represented the the victim, said: "It's a landmark decision, there's no previous precedent. It opens the floodgates and I'm quite sure there will be a lot of cases."

Jay, of Wirral, Merseyside, was struck 11 times as his attacker continued to lash out even though he was screaming in pain and bleeding profusely. He was rescued when the other boy's parents heard his shouts and noticed the car windscreen had been cracked, such was the ferocity of the assault.
Following his client's successful appeal to the Tribunals Service, Mr Kirwan said: "The Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA) risibly argued that because the child was under 10, there was no criminal intent. When we went on the first appeal it was argued by CICA that it was an accident, which is so ridiculous as to be unbelievable.
"The doctor in the hospital had described our client's injuries as the worst of a child that age sustained at the hands of a child of equal age with a weapon." The attacker has since been taken into care.
Jay's mother Renai Williams, 29, told Sky News she did not know how much compensation her son would receive.
A CICA spokesman said: "We express our sympathy to all victims of crime and their families. We make payments to victims of violent crime as a gesture of public sympathy - to show that society recognises what they have suffered. To ensure that the application of the scheme is as robust as possible there are safeguards built in.
"All cases are decided on their own merits and, if an applicant does not think their case was assessed fairly, they may apply to have it reviewed. If the applicant remains unhappy after the review they can appeal to an independent tribunal."

__________

While I can see this child had as much right as anyone to claim compensation, shouldn't the person who left the children alone with a car jack within reach, be claimed against?
Who in their right mind would leave two three years olds alone in a car long enough for this to happen, they shouldn't have been left at all.

Lizx

Sharron

Sharron Report 13 Nov 2009 15:54

I would have thought a jack would be very heavy for a small child to wield too.

ElizabethK

ElizabethK Report 13 Nov 2009 16:11

The BBC News at one o'clock (TV) said the other child was now "in care" !

AnninGlos

AnninGlos Report 13 Nov 2009 16:43

I read that as well. I had a couple of thoughts besides wondering about leaving a couple of toddlers in a car. What was the jack doing in the car and how could a three year old manage to lift it high enough to hit another child over the head. he must be a strong three year old. I imagine that the Mother would not have the money to pay anyway so it is better to claim from the victim's fund.

maggiewinchester

maggiewinchester Report 13 Nov 2009 17:39

Sounds like the attacker needs to be in care - even 3 year olds should have a certain amount of empathy. god help his neighbourhood when he grows up!

Have to agree with others - what was the jack - or any dangerous implement doing in the car with the children, and why were they left there alone?
If leaving a small child unattended at home is illegal, surely leaving them unattended in a car is equally against the law.

Purple **^*Sparkly*^** Diamond

Purple **^*Sparkly*^** Diamond Report 14 Nov 2009 02:07

This was on tv during the news but o.h. talked over it, so I didn't hear the report.

I hope social services are keeping an eye on the lad who was attacked as well as having the other lad in care.

I too wondered how a 3 year old could find a jack inside a car and wield it so much as to cause bad injuries. They must have been left quite some time for a thing like that to happen, I would imagine, he wouldn't have picked it up and started hitting out immediately the driver left the car.

Lizx