General Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: March 2003 Posts: 7,819 Send Message	InspectorGreenPen	Report	10 Nov 2006 13:01
Member Since: March 2003 Posts: 7,819 Send Message	I don't think it is possible if you enter the names manually, more likely to have been in an uploaded gedcom. I was under the impression that living relations names still appeared in the indexes, it was just that they showed as 'living' when you viewed someones tree.
Member Since: January 2005 Posts: 1,226 Send Message	Joe ex Bexleyheath	Report	10 Nov 2006 11:46
	Just received - why bother ?? shows a tree with lots of unnamed people born about 1890 Living Relations !!

All site material is owned by Findmypast Limited and should not be used without prior permission.

Any views expressed in message boards and members notes represent the opinions of the author and do not represent the opinions of Findmypast Limited.