Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Need a fresh pair of eyes please
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Rachel | Report | 10 Dec 2008 21:56 |
I can find this family in most of the census' but I am struggling to find their birth or marriage references - can anyone help please? |
|||
|
Pat from Wesham | Report | 10 Dec 2008 22:40 |
Rachel have you found them in the 1901 census or before, if you post details it will be easier to find them for you, ie where they where living at time of census. |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 10 Dec 2008 22:51 |
Hi, |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 10 Dec 2008 22:57 |
St Helen's is Prescot district. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 10 Dec 2008 22:59 |
Marriages Dec 1877 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 10 Dec 2008 23:05 |
I see, but I have also found some of them in the 1901 census: |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 10 Dec 2008 23:12 |
Births Mar 1878 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Pat from Wesham | Report | 10 Dec 2008 23:14 |
1891 England Census 1891 England Census |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 10 Dec 2008 23:19 |
Thank you very much for your help. I was beginning to wonder where I needed to look - and seeing 2 different places of birth really threw me. |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 10 Dec 2008 23:19 |
I'm not sure the family you have in 1901 is the same one. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 10 Dec 2008 23:21 |
Rachel, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 10 Dec 2008 23:24 |
Who is it that is your relative? We need to make sure we're following the correct Cain(e)s. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 10 Dec 2008 23:34 |
Hi, |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 10 Dec 2008 23:38 |
I suppose another way to know if we have the right family would be to see if we can find these on the 1901 census and to see which area they are living in. |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 10 Dec 2008 23:40 |
Rachel, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 10 Dec 2008 23:41 |
Rachel, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 10 Dec 2008 23:58 |
This looks to be the family: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 11 Dec 2008 00:05 |
1891: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 11 Dec 2008 16:59 |
Hi Rose, |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 11 Dec 2008 17:29 |
No sign of any of the births under any variant of Cain. |
|||
Researching: |