Genealogy Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: March 2003 Posts: 278 Send Message	corcoran74	Report	29 May 2005 16:11
	Hi Back in 1927 was it possible to lie on the birth cert who the mother was, and would a have man been able to register alone. Many thanks
	Researching: Corcoran, garrity/geraughty, Sweeney,
Member Since: January 0001 Posts: 0 Send Message	Unknown	Report	29 May 2005 17:53
Member Since: January 0001 Posts: 0 Send Message	Yes he would,if he said he was the ''father and husband of the mother'... A birth doesnt have to be registered by the parents and that stands today, but a birth must by law be registered the details given must be given as the TRUTH .this applies to UK, The lying??? Kay.

All site material is owned by Findmypast Limited and should not be used without prior permission.

Any views expressed in message boards and members notes represent the opinions of the author and do not represent the opinions of Findmypast Limited.